[jboss-as7-dev] Logging ids for EJB subsystem (already almost) exhausted!

[Jaikiran Pai]

On Thursday 26 January 2012 05:15 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> or is https://community.jboss.org/wiki/LoggingIds simply just the number ranges within
> the JBAS subsystem ?
Yes, that page lists the JBAS subsystem ranges. So the ids for EJB 
subsystem within JBAS are currently allocated to be between (JBAS) 
14100-14399.

-Jaikiran
>
> Maybe EJB needs its own subsystem id ?
>
> …or is the i18n number system just completely separate from this ?
>
> /max
>
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 08:24, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>> This relates to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3454 where Carlo
>> noticed that in the EJB subsystem (and perhaps in some other subsystem
>> too) we exceed the numeric range for logging ids listed here
>> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/LoggingIds. I see a couple of problems
>> here:
>>
>> 1) The fact that we are already having almost more than 200 message ids
>> for EJB subsystem alone makes it look like a bit too much IMO. Looking
>> at many of those messages, they are sometimes related to invalid
>> arguments being passed to methods and we throwing
>> IllegalArgumentException with a specific message id. Unfortunately, this
>> appears to be repeated many times with different ids with a different
>> message instead of just having a common id/message (perhaps across
>> subsystems).
>>
>> 2) There are some unused message ids (left around after some refactoring
>> of code and no longer relevant). Is it too late to clean this up now? I
>> mean, obviously using an existing message id for a new log message
>> instead of what it represented earlier isn't a good idea after a catalog
>> of message ids has been published. But as of now, we don't have such a
>> catalog published anywhere. So should I go ahead and cleanup some of
>> these unused message ids?
>>
>> 3) How do I go about this specific issue? Use a new range for more EJB
>> messages? So we would end up with some EJB messages in the range
>> 14100-14399 and some others in 19100-19399 (an example). Is that
>> multiple set of ranges for a subsystem a good thing? What happens the
>> next time we exhaust this range? The other option I see is that there
>> are some unused message ids between 14143 and 14300. I can refactor the
>> existing messages (which are falling outside the allocated range) to use
>> the unused ids, but then it depends on what we decide about #2 above
>> (i.e. some of the 143xx ids that were used earlier will no longer we
>> relevant).
>>
>> -Jaikiran
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>