[jboss-as7-dev] Logging ids for EJB subsystem (already almost) exhausted!

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

> On Thursday 26 January 2012 05:15 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> or is https://community.jboss.org/wiki/LoggingIds simply just the number ranges within
>> the JBAS subsystem ?
> Yes, that page lists the JBAS subsystem ranges. So the ids for EJB subsystem within JBAS are currently allocated to be between (JBAS) 14100-14399.

gotcha so I wasn't all confused ;)

I just thought the "bigger" subsystems of AS would have its own "group" and not just subrange.

/max

> 
> -Jaikiran
>> 
>> Maybe EJB needs its own subsystem id ?
>> 
>> …or is the i18n number system just completely separate from this ?
>> 
>> /max
>> 
>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 08:24, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> 
>>> This relates to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3454 where Carlo
>>> noticed that in the EJB subsystem (and perhaps in some other subsystem
>>> too) we exceed the numeric range for logging ids listed here
>>> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/LoggingIds. I see a couple of problems
>>> here:
>>> 
>>> 1) The fact that we are already having almost more than 200 message ids
>>> for EJB subsystem alone makes it look like a bit too much IMO. Looking
>>> at many of those messages, they are sometimes related to invalid
>>> arguments being passed to methods and we throwing
>>> IllegalArgumentException with a specific message id. Unfortunately, this
>>> appears to be repeated many times with different ids with a different
>>> message instead of just having a common id/message (perhaps across
>>> subsystems).
>>> 
>>> 2) There are some unused message ids (left around after some refactoring
>>> of code and no longer relevant). Is it too late to clean this up now? I
>>> mean, obviously using an existing message id for a new log message
>>> instead of what it represented earlier isn't a good idea after a catalog
>>> of message ids has been published. But as of now, we don't have such a
>>> catalog published anywhere. So should I go ahead and cleanup some of
>>> these unused message ids?
>>> 
>>> 3) How do I go about this specific issue? Use a new range for more EJB
>>> messages? So we would end up with some EJB messages in the range
>>> 14100-14399 and some others in 19100-19399 (an example). Is that
>>> multiple set of ranges for a subsystem a good thing? What happens the
>>> next time we exhaust this range? The other option I see is that there
>>> are some unused message ids between 14143 and 14300. I can refactor the
>>> existing messages (which are falling outside the allocated range) to use
>>> the unused ids, but then it depends on what we decide about #2 above
>>> (i.e. some of the 143xx ids that were used earlier will no longer we
>>> relevant).
>>> 
>>> -Jaikiran
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>> 
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen