[jboss-cvs] JBossAS SVN: r76872 - projects/docs/enterprise/4.3.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/en-US.
jboss-cvs-commits at lists.jboss.org
jboss-cvs-commits at lists.jboss.org
Sun Aug 10 21:59:48 EDT 2008
Author: irooskov at redhat.com
Date: 2008-08-10 21:59:48 -0400 (Sun, 10 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 76872
Modified:
projects/docs/enterprise/4.3.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/en-US/Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml
Log:
removed occurances of 'aspectized' from the documentation
Modified: projects/docs/enterprise/4.3.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/en-US/Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml
===================================================================
--- projects/docs/enterprise/4.3.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/en-US/Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml 2008-08-11 01:53:33 UTC (rev 76871)
+++ projects/docs/enterprise/4.3.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/en-US/Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml 2008-08-11 01:59:48 UTC (rev 76872)
@@ -980,10 +980,7 @@
<para>To solve the first kind of issue, in JBoss Cache 1.2.4 we
introduced the concept of a
<literal>TreeCacheMarshaller</literal>
- .
- Basically, this allows application code to register a classloader
- with a portion of the cache tree for use in handling objects
- replicated to that portion. See the TreeCacheMarshaller section of
+ . This allows the code within the application to create a classloader for use with a portion of the cache tree that will handle objects replicated to that portion. See the TreeCacheMarshaller section of
the user guide for more details.
</para>
@@ -1152,8 +1149,7 @@
transactional POJO (plain old Java object) cache. By POJO, we mean
that the cache: 1) automatically manages object mapping and
relationship for a client under both local and replicated cache
- mode, 2) provides support for inheritance relationship between
- "aspectized" POJOs. By leveraging the dynamic AOP in JBossAop, it is
+ mode, 2) provides support for inheritance between POJOs created under Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP). This allows a user to modify code at runtime without inflicting this change permanently on the program. By leveraging the dynamic AOP in JBossAop, it is
able to map a complex object into the cache store, preserve and
manage the object relationship behind the scene. During replication
mode, it performs fine-granularity (i.e., on a per-field basis)
@@ -1312,7 +1308,7 @@
option called
<literal>aopc</literal>
. You can use this option to
- pre-compile your "aspectized" POJO. Once the classes have been byte
+ pre-compile your AOP created POJO. Once the classes have been byte
code generated, they can be treated as regular class files, i.e.,
you will not need to include any
<literal>jboss-aop.xml</literal>
@@ -1370,17 +1366,17 @@
<literal>Person</literal>
) to be
"prepared", a JBossAop term to denote that the object will be
- "aspectized" by the system. After this declaration, JBossAop will
+ created using AOP, by the system. After this declaration, JBossAop will
invoke any interceptor that associates with this POJO. PojoCache
will dynamically add an
<literal>org.jboss.cache.aop.CacheInterceptor</literal>
to this POJO
to perform object mapping and relationship management.
</para>
-
- <para>Note that to add your POJO, you should declare all the fields
- to be "prepared" as in the example.
+ <note>
+ <para>To add your POJO, you should declare all the fields to be "prepared" as in the example.
</para>
+ </note>
</answer>
</qandaentry>
@@ -1505,7 +1501,7 @@
<qandaentry>
<question>
- <para>When I declare my POJO to be "aspectized", what happens to the
+ <para>When I declare my POJO to be created using AOP, what happens to the
fields with transient, static, and final modifiers?
</para>
</question>
@@ -1588,7 +1584,7 @@
<literal>Set</literal>
, and
<literal>Map</literal>
- without users to declare them "aspectized".
+ without users to declare them as being created using Aspect-Oriented Programming.
It is done via a dynamic proxy. Here is a code snippet to use an
<literal>ArrayList</literal>
proxy class.
@@ -1668,7 +1664,7 @@
<qandaentry>
<question>
- <para>What happens when my "aspectized" POJO has field members that
+ <para>What happens when my AOP POJO has field members that
are of Collection class ?
</para>
</question>
More information about the jboss-cvs-commits
mailing list