[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remoting - Multiplexed (Bidirectional) Transport

[tom.elrod@jboss.com]

anonymous wrote : 
  | What I don't agree with is the need to have callback servers, as in pieces of code wrapped around server sockets on the client side . Once you have a TCP/IP connection from client to server, use that and don't open another one from server to client.
  | 

Although a callback server is needed on the client side, this does not necessarily mean a server socket is needed.  If using the multiplex transport, it can use the same client socket to receive call back from the server (using virtual sockets).  I have tested this through my firewall and know that the multiplex transport supports this.  So think the functional requirement of multiplex is already met.  Now would be a question of either performance not being good enough or programming model not fitting.

I agree that we need Ron's input as to how much more performance gains can realistically be expected of the multiplex transport.









View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979236#3979236

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979236