[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Status of annotation based configuration

[ALRubinger]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : Why do they have to specify a default pool implementation? Most likely all they want to do is change the pool size?

A much better point.

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : We should define defaults somewhere and reference them from the three places that use.

OK, but if we externalize the defaults into a "constants" class/interface, it'll have to go into ext-api for @Pool to get at it.  I don't think this is too implementation-specific to be a problem, but worth noting.

S,
ALR

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106430#4106430

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106430