[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Status of annotation based configuration

[adrian@jboss.org]

"ALRubinger" wrote : 
  | OK, but if we externalize the defaults into a "constants" class/interface, it'll have to go into ext-api for @Pool to get at it.  I don't think this is too implementation-specific to be a problem, but worth noting.
  | 
  | S,
  | ALR

If you don't like the default being in ext-api, make the defaultPool "##Default" or
"*Default" then bind that to a real runtime default in your PoolFactoryRegistry config.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4106435#4106435

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4106435