[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-786

[gavin.king@jboss.com]

anonymous wrote : Again, can't we just tell SEAM to change their method name and disallow EJBObject methods on Remote interfaces like EJB2.1 does?

Seam is not the only application in the universe that I could imagine defining a method named "remove".

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4090761#4090761

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4090761