[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-786

[gavin.king@jboss.com]

anonymous wrote : Keep implementation as it current stands, but add new metadata (ie. @NoEjb2View) which will designate that we shouldn't have EJBObject be implemented by the Proxy. Benefit here is that we keep support to EJB3.0 and EJB2.1 clients by default, and provide mechanism for Seam to have their "remove" method. 

This is definitely not OK. It is an @ActuallyComplyWithTheEJBSpec annotation.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4090762#4090762

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4090762