[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [sim] language features

[camunda]

1.) Use Simulation engine for load testing: Hmm, I am not really sure about this usage. Load testing normally involves some more sophisticated load generating strategy, for example with more than one computer. This is not addressed by the simulation engine at the moment, even if it could be, if simulation runs are too slow. But this would be stuff for the very far future ;-)

And you don't get real information about calculation time, because simulation time has nothing to do with real time. And all figures and logs refer only to the model time.

2.) The Namespaces: The old discussion :-) I can tell you, Ronald, why I don't like them: Because it gets less readable for the human. But I agree with you, that it is nice for validation and that stuff.

But to be honest: The most bigger jbpm projects I know remove the jpdl schema (because the add stuff themselves and don't use namespaces or, most faimous, they have a proxy in the company an eclipse can not access the http:... schema, which leads to waiting times while saveing the process. And the configuration property in eclipse is not well knwon. Or for completly other reasons).

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4092850#4092850

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4092850