[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP asintegration WITHOUT the integration :-)

[kabir.khan@jboss.com]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : "kabir.khan at jboss.com" wrote : 
  |   | Are you saying "don't use it", or "use it and we'll retrofit an SPI"? :-) As far as I can tell I will need information from the ClassLoaderPolicy.
  | 
  | I'm saying any use of the classloading metadata for the AOP domain construction
  | would be a hack until we have a real solution based on metadata context
  | rather than the classloader of the aspectized class/aspect class/joinpoint.
  | 
  | The latter (classloader solution) is just a temporary solution to reproduce
  | what jboss4 does. I don't think we need to create a SPI (which we will need to
  | support forever) for something that is a temporary hack.
  | 
  | If we created a SPI, it wouldn't be the Unified ClassLoader or the new classloader
  | it would have to cover all possible classloading models that people might want
  | to plugin to the deployers.

I am thinking about if we need to create special classpools understanding the new loaders. Let's ignore this for now until I am sure that these pools will be needed

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4086258#4086258

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4086258