[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService equiv to ServiceBindingManager

[adrian@jboss.org]

anonymous wrote : 
  | Design Question: This inclusion of service binding in the bootstrap isn't strictly necessary, just how I've approached it so far. I did it that way because a) the service does have to be loaded early, before stuff in conf/jboss-service.xml that needs binding configuration and b) the binding configuration file is pretty long and complex and IMHO should be in its own file. The bootstrap mechanism was a quick-and-dirty way to get that file parsed and loaded into the MC. 
  | 

The issue here is that we have no conf/jboss-beans.xml equivalent
other than the bootstrap files.

In practice this bootstrap stage of the profile service should disappear
once all the mbeans have been moved out of conf/jboss-service.xml

The ServiceBindingManager would then live in deploy and automatically
get deployed in order correctly based on MC dependencies.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4169051#4169051

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4169051