[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService equiv to ServiceBindingManager

[adrian@jboss.org]

anonymous wrote : 
  | Question: Is there any benefit to the Profile Service and/or management tools from the name="xxx" attribute on the ServiceBinding beans? If they can be anonymous, configuration will be simpler. 
  | 

As far as the profile service is concerned, it is upto the ServiceBindingManager
to provide a ManagedObject to the profile service that allows any management
console to understand how to configure it.
This should include properties or ManagedObjects
that let you configure the store/configuration file as well.

The only reason to give a special name would be so a management console can
identify it and give it some extra prominance or categorization, but that
only needs to be done on the ManagedObject. The implementation details of the POJO
should largely be hidden.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4169053#4169053

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4169053