[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: New jBPM Console

[tom.baeyens@jboss.com]

"mark.proctor at jboss.com" wrote : "fady.matar" wrote : The application will be built on top of JBoss Seam + Richfaces
  | 
  | I've made this point before. The web technologies used for jBPM should be aligned with what we are doing with Drools.  Mic has proven his stack works and has had great success. I really would recommend you don't go down the RichFaces route.

Similarly I asked the rethoric question: "Why can't drools console be build in JSF and so be aligned with jBPM ?"

You ignore the fact that JSF knowledge is much wider spread.  Which means that buiding the site in JSF makes it easer for us to deliver JSF components which will be an interesting asset for our project.  Also JSF related expertise is easier to find/get/manage.

Apart from that, I don't see GWT being the strategic direction for JBoss.  I only see drools using it within JBoss.  I see JBoss in general as somewhat neutral (seam supporting many UI techs) but a big tendency towards JSF related technologies.

>From my perspective, all in conclusion, the drools GWT route currently doesn't have enough weight to make it an easy decision.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139572#4139572

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139572