[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: migrating TransactionManager and Invokers to POJO

[alesj]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : In practice we don't need an instance proxy for the @JMX annotation
  | so we should probably look at creating a meta annotation
  | to exclude @JMX from the decision as to whether an instance proxy is required.
I though the proxy instance came from this:

  |    <!-- Add the JMX -->
  |    <aop:lifecycle-configure xmlns:aop="urn:jboss:aop-beans:1.0"
  |                name="JMXAdvice"
  |                class="org.jboss.system.microcontainer.jmx.ServiceControllerLifecycleCallback"
  |                classes="@org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.aspects.jmx.JMX"
  |                manager-bean="AspectManager"
  |                manager-property="aspectManager">
  |       <property name="serviceController"><inject bean="JMXKernel" property="serviceController"/></property>
  |    </aop:lifecycle-configure>
  | 

Or do we really create proxy instance (if AOP present) for instance annotations?



View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140172#4140172

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140172