[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Support marshaling or unmarshaling the soap message us

[jim.ma]

"maeste" wrote : My doubts is about how the configuration can become pain if you would expose objects more and more complex than a class containing a string.
Yes. That's correct. We need to add some complex annotation configuration file(jaxb annotation introduction) for a complex type. If jbossws native only supports the jaxb databinding , that's the only option.
I will look at the jbossws native and find out if it has its own databinding to handle the pojo class(class without annotation).
"maeste" wrote : 
  | The other question is: are you thinking only at a marshal/unmarshal feature, or are you planning also some logical mappings between what is exposed as ws and internal data?
Are you asking if I plan use OGNL framework or something to map the soap message to internal ESB message and payload conversion ?  If the marshal/unmarshal feature can handle all the cases, I'd prefer to add marshal/unmarshal feature.  It's straightforward.  What do you think?

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4152586#4152586

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4152586