[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: Using temp at undeploy

[alesj]

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : I'm looking through the changes, and it appears this automatically identifies contexts as temps if a specified metadata file exists. In the server we would presumably register all know deployment descriptors?
  | 
You register what you like. :-)
You can either change whole StructureProcessor impl,
or you can just add custom ModificationTypeMatcher(s).

My drive for this was Seam's request to have temp for all Seam apps,
hence I needed to recognize/match deployments that are possible Seam apps.

This is what we need to add in order to make it happen:

  |    <bean name="ModificationTypeStructureProcessor" class="org.jboss.deployers.vfs.plugins.structure.modify.ModificationTypeStructureProcessor">
  |      <incallback method="addMatcher"/>
  |      <uncallback method="removeMatcher"/>
  |    </bean>
  | 
  |    <!-- The holder for deployers that determine structure -->
  |    <bean name="StructuralDeployers" class="org.jboss.deployers.vfs.plugins.structure.VFSStructuralDeployersImpl">
  |       <property name="structureBuilder">
  |          <!-- The consolidator of the structure information -->
  |          <bean name="StructureBuilder" class="org.jboss.deployers.vfs.plugins.structure.VFSStructureBuilder">
  |            <property name="structureProcessor"><inject bean="ModificationTypeStructureProcessor"/></property>
  |          </bean>
  |       </property>
  | 
  | public class SeamModificationTypeMatcher extends TempTopModificationTypeMatcher
  | {
  |    public SeamModificationTypeMatcher()
  |    {
  |       super(SeamConstants.SEAM_FILES);
  |    }
  | }
  | 
  |   <!-- Seam modification type matcher -->
  |   <bean name="SeamMTMatcher" class="org.jboss.seam.integration.microcontainer.deployers.SeamModificationTypeMatcher"/>
  | 
  | 

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | Its possible to have a nested deployment that has no descriptors. In that case you still will have to include a jboss-structure.xml I take it?
  | 
Yes.

Or you can write a different StructureProcessor or 
a ModificationTypeMatcher that doesn't 'work' on descriptors; 
e.g. might work on classpath or predetermined attachments


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205499#4205499

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205499