[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Deployment cleanup & modifications

[alesj]

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : Not that this is relevant for this release, but how much of the copying is required due to jar file native locking issues?
  | 
I'm not aware of any issue that would force use to use copy to resolve native locking issues.
We do copy so we can handle nested jars w/o in-memory usage.

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | or is this an issue of concurrent access to virtual files that should have a valid view even after being deleted?
  | 
Yes, temp is for undeploy resources lookups.
Although like (c) item states, it won't always work.

How was this dealt in previous 4.x version?
I guess temp resources produced 'temp' urls.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205503#4205503

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4205503