[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Naming, @JNDI and OnDemand

[adrian@jboss.org]

"alesj" wrote : WRT
  |  - initial ml post: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2008-November/012997.html
  |  - the latest ml post (where Adrian moves his code to svn): http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2009-May/014341.html
  | 
  | A few questions after checking the code.
  | (1) 
  | 
  |   | /**
  |   |  * JNDI.
  |   |  * 
  |   |  * TODO move to AS integration project
  |   |  * @author <a href="adrian at jboss.com">Adrian Brock</a>
  |   | 
  | Where exactly would you wanna move this?
  | What should we do with "duplicated" @JndiBinding in AOP-MC-int?
  | 

We need a standard annotation that is provided independent of the implementation.
AS integration project is here:
http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/integration/
as previously discussed on the dev list it is supposed to allow users to not have to
worry about the implemementations of how it is actually implemented.
e.g. in maven you import org.jboss.integration:naming not jnpserver or aop.

anonymous wrote : 
  | (3) Basically the OnDemand test is completely broken. :-)
  | 

I said it was largely untested, but you were in a hurry for me to commit it. :-)


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230465#4230465

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230465