[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Transactions Development] - Re: Remoting Transport Transaction Inflow Design Discussion

[Mark Little]

Mark Little [http://community.jboss.org/people/marklittle] created the discussion

"Re: Remoting Transport Transaction Inflow Design Discussion"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/621469#621469

--------------------------------------------------------------
> David Lloyd wrote:
> 
> > Mark Little wrote:
> > 
> > And of course another option is to replace JacORB with another IIOP implementation.
> 
> Jonathan tells us this is prohibitive from a resource perspective.  In any case, I do not believe this would create a substantial enough improvement in performance, even if that were the only issue with going the IIOP-only route.

I don't know about the resource perspective at this point, but I know it would be a lot less than writing another distributed transactions protocol ;-) I ported the C++ and Java transaction services to pretty much every C++ or Java ORB on the planet by 2005.

As to performance? That really depends what we're trying to achieve and when. It's an option. Whether it's the right option in the long term and for all use cases, I don't think anyone can say precisely at this point.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/621469#621469]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2041]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20110817/38a6c8c8/attachment.html