[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Transactions Development] - Re: Remoting Transport Transaction Inflow Design Discussion

[David Lloyd]

David Lloyd [http://community.jboss.org/people/dmlloyd] created the discussion

"Re: Remoting Transport Transaction Inflow Design Discussion"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/621483#621483

--------------------------------------------------------------
> Mark Little wrote:
> 
> > David Lloyd wrote:
> > 
> > > Mark Little wrote:
> > > 
> > > And of course another option is to replace JacORB with another IIOP implementation.
> > 
> > Jonathan tells us this is prohibitive from a resource perspective.  In any case, I do not believe this would create a substantial enough improvement in performance, even if that were the only issue with going the IIOP-only route.
> 
> I don't know about the resource perspective at this point, but I know it would be a lot less than writing another distributed transactions protocol ;-) I ported the C++ and Java transaction services to pretty much every C++ or Java ORB on the planet by 2005.
> 
> As to performance? That really depends what we're trying to achieve and when. It's an option. Whether it's the right option in the long term and for all use cases, I don't think anyone can say precisely at this point.
Okay, well we've proposed more than once to move off of JacORB.  I'd be in favor for sure.  But I think that's a peripheral topic at this point.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/621483#621483]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2041]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-dev-forums/attachments/20110817/8c57f611/attachment.html