[JBoss-dev] Re: JBossMQ in JBoss5

[Ovidiu Feodorov]

OK, so the decision to bundle JBossMQ with JBoss 5 is taken and etched 
in stone?

Andrig T Miller wrote:
> Okay.  Makes perfect sense.
>
> We should start a discussion on what things customers are doing with 
> JBossMQ that are barriers to moving to JBoss Messaging.  This is very 
> important for the messaging project to understand.
>
> Also, we will still need to make sure that any feature enhancements to 
> JBossMQ are also put into JBoss Messaging.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andy
>
> On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 16:59 +0200, Adrian Brock wrote:
>> On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 14:35 +0000, Andrig T Miller wrote:
>> > Why is a conversion not an option for some customers?  
>>
>> Because some customers add bits to JBossMQ,
>> e.g. writing their own persitence manager or interceptor.
>> Admittedly it is not that common, but it happens.
>>
>> More common is use of the JMX interface/names for 
>> management/monitoring.
>>
>> e.g. a common usage is creating a queue/topic "on the fly"
>> (not a temporary queue).
>>
>> JBoss Messaging and MQ are not compatible at this
>> level so it requires an investment in retooling
>> where it is used.
>>
>> The important part is that they have time to do
>> this with a sufficient notification, without
>> being left behind.
>>
>> Besides, it shows an investment in long term support.
>> Telling people "we don't support that anymore,
>> look at this shiny new toy instead" isn't always
>> what they want to hear. :-)
>>     
> Andrig (Andy) Miller
> VP, Engineering
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/attachments/20060918/872974e8/attachment.html