[jboss-dev] JBoss Unified I18N Infrastructure

[Bill Burke]

Then David should be involved.

Thomas Heute wrote:
> Caius Carlos Chance wrote:
>>
>>>> Another advantage of using gettext is, there is an existing 
>>>> localization team in Red Hat could be leveraged for the all JBoss 
>>>> modules when the I18N infrastructure on JBoss could be integrated 
>>>> with current workflow (e.g. tools, work file formats, etc.) of them. 
>>>> They have done the translation for JBoss Installer and they are very 
>>>> familiar on working with .po files that are used by gettext.
>>>>     
>>> Sure, but requiring the projects to add an additional 3rd party jar 
>>> is wrong (especially one I've never seen used in java)
>>> Would be relevant to know how the java properties support would work...
>>>   
>> It will be good idea if all modules could unify their I18N 
>> infrastructure. If so, also there would be only 1 convertor needed to 
>> be developed for the translation team. The development of the 
>> convertor may allow both translation team and current jboss developer 
>> keep minimal changes on workflow/code.
> 
> +1 for unification if the "standard" doesn't suck.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com