[jboss-dev] JBoss Unified I18N Infrastructure
Thomas Heute
theute at redhat.com
Fri Aug 10 02:44:15 EDT 2007
Caius Carlos Chance wrote:
>
>>> Another advantage of using gettext is, there is an existing localization
>>> team in Red Hat could be leveraged for the all JBoss modules when the
>>> I18N infrastructure on JBoss could be integrated with current workflow
>>> (e.g. tools, work file formats, etc.) of them. They have done the
>>> translation for JBoss Installer and they are very familiar on working
>>> with .po files that are used by gettext.
>>>
>> Sure, but requiring the projects to add an additional 3rd party jar is
>> wrong (especially one I've never seen used in java)
>> Would be relevant to know how the java properties support would work...
>>
> It will be good idea if all modules could unify their I18N
> infrastructure. If so, also there would be only 1 convertor needed to be
> developed for the translation team. The development of the convertor may
> allow both translation team and current jboss developer keep minimal
> changes on workflow/code.
+1 for unification if the "standard" doesn't suck.
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list