[jboss-dev] JBoss Unified I18N Infrastructure

Thomas Heute theute at redhat.com
Fri Aug 10 02:44:15 EDT 2007


Caius Carlos Chance wrote:
> 
>>> Another advantage of using gettext is, there is an existing localization 
>>> team in Red Hat could be leveraged for the all JBoss modules when the 
>>> I18N infrastructure on JBoss could be integrated with current workflow 
>>> (e.g. tools, work file formats, etc.) of them. They have done the 
>>> translation for JBoss Installer and they are very familiar on working 
>>> with .po files that are used by gettext.
>>>     
>> Sure, but requiring the projects to add an additional 3rd party jar is 
>> wrong (especially one I've never seen used in java)
>> Would be relevant to know how the java properties support would work...
>>   
> It will be good idea if all modules could unify their I18N 
> infrastructure. If so, also there would be only 1 convertor needed to be 
> developed for the translation team. The development of the convertor may 
> allow both translation team and current jboss developer keep minimal 
> changes on workflow/code.

+1 for unification if the "standard" doesn't suck.




More information about the jboss-development mailing list