[jboss-dev] Why Maven sucks (part 1)
Rémy Maucherat
remy.maucherat at gmail.com
Tue Apr 22 10:38:08 EDT 2008
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Adrian Brock <abrock at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 14:05 +0200, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > Last friday, it couldn't get me the proper version of a JAR
> > (jboss-vfs.jar), for whatever reason (I don't want to know the reason,
> > really). It also maintains two repositories, which sounds bad to me.
> > Why keep arguing about the obvious ?
>
> These is really none issues.
>
> The two repositories are a transitional problem because
> we aren't fully using maven.
Yes, I noticed. One of the issues with Maven is that if you don't
embrace it completely, then it turns out to do more bad than good.
> We use the maven repository to create a jboss-head/thirdparty
> repository which the old buildmagic recognises.
>
> Once we move to full maven there will be NO jboss-head/thirdparty.
> It's redundant but not a real problem.
>
> The jboss-vfs problem is related to the snapshots issues we have
> been discussing. i.e. no proper version control.
>
> It didn't spot the new snapshot created last Friday because
> it only checks for changed snapshots once a day.
Ah ok. So it's not a bug, it's a feature :) If it doesn't happen
again, then it's a start. This episode was a bit stressful, since a
lot of pressure was put on Jean-Frédéric to fix some deployment bug
ASAP, and I couldn't help him.
Rémy
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list