[jboss-dev] [Fwd: [jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: Getting rid of conf/jboss-service.xml]
Scott Stark
sstark at redhat.com
Thu Oct 16 13:20:43 EDT 2008
I don't think we want the bindings service in minimal. Do we still need
the bindings.xml in bootstrap?
P.S. I forgot about the minimal config. Should that be part of the
smoke-tests?
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> There was a problem with the minimal config not booting. To fix that:
>
> 1) I've removed the jndi service from the jboss-minimal.xml and copied
> the deploy/naming-jboss-beans.xml instead.
>
> 2) God rid of the conf/xmdesc/Naming* descriptors, as I think those
> are not used now, but re-instanted the Log4jService-xmbean.xml one
>
> 3) Used the same bootstrap.xml that we have in 'default' that brings
> in the bindinds.xml, too, due to the bindind service used by
> naming-jboss-beans.xml
>
> 4) Added minimal/lib/jboss-bindingservice.jar
>
> The question is if we want to keep the binding service in the minimal
> config, or use a simplified version of the
> deploy/naming-jboss-beans.xml with a subset of the beans:
>
> LookupPool
> LocalNamingBean
> RemoteNamingBean
> JndiViewBean
> NamingService
>
> The more general question is if we want to alter the minimal config in
> some manner:
>
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6103
>
More information about the jboss-development
mailing list