[jboss-dev] Abstract classes?

[Jaikiran Pai]

Adrian Brock wrote:
> Frankly, I've got better things to do than worry about whether
> somebody can understand what a class does from its name without
> reading the javadoc or even the code (it is open source).
There was no javadocs and i did read the source code - but honestly it's 
too complex for me to understand the usage of the classes and hence this 
thread. The only reason i brought up this thread was to understand the 
usage of such classes better and if there was more to it than just:

> "Abstract" has nothing to do with the "abstract" keyword in java.
>   
That's all i wanted to know. I respect the freedom each developer has, 
to name the classes as per his choice. 

regards,
-Jaikiran