[jboss-dev] JMX stuff WAS Re: M2 planning and timeline

[Dimitris Andreadis]

It would be interesting to see if their is any performance difference using our or JDK's 
mbeanserver implementation.

Adrian Brock wrote:
> I changed trunk to use the external JBossMX last February.
> 
> There was a release of Beta2 in March which was mainly
> a tidyup release.
> 
> Anil's fix was in May. but since he hasn't created a JBMX jira for 
> his fix is doesn't appear on that project's roadmap.
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310785&fixfor=12313430
> 
> I'll do a Beta3 release for that.
> 
> The mc-jmx-int and deployers-jmx stuff was only in the 2.2.x branches
> of the MC projects. Now that you've upgraded trunk to those versions it
> should be a lot easier to use the external versions.
> 
> ejb3 was already using it.
> 
> I'll test it, and change trunk to use them. Then we can remove the
> duplicate code from system-jmx.
> 
> The only additional issue is whether we still want to use the JBossMX
> mbeanserver now that I have a way to use the JDK's MBeanServer.
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMX-11
> We could keep the choice, since its just a case of
> changing the MBeanServerBuilder system property.
> 
> We still need the j2se and mbeans stuff for the legacy XMBean support.
> 
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 11:34 +0100, Ales Justin wrote:
>>> Are we going to do a new release of the org.jboss.mx artifacts (AS is 
>>> currently using 6.0.0.Beta1)?  
>> Does this mean we're using our externalized JBossMX?
>> Afaik, we're not yet ready to switch AS to use externalized version.
>> * 
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2009-December/015142.html
>>
>> Adrian?
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development