[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Behavior of 'viewrecursive' security constraint

halversp do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Nov 7 09:13:55 EST 2006


I'm having difficulty understanding the expected behavior of the 'viewrecursive' constraint action. If I define a page with a  viewrecursive security constraint, I would expect any subpages to inherit that same constraint. For example, given a deployment structure like:

  | <page>
  |   <page-name>A</page-name>
  |   ... <!-- page contents -->
  |   <page>
  |     <page-name>B</page-name>
  |        ... <!-- page contents -->
  |        <!-- no explicit security constraint -->
  |   </page>     
  |   <security-constraint>
  |     <policy-permission>
  |       <role-name>RoleA</role-name>
  |       <action-name>viewrecursive</action-name>
  |     </policy-permission>
  |   </security-constraint>
  | </page> 
  | 
I would expect that page 'B' would be viewable by (and only by) 'RoleA' users. Instead, page 'B'  ends up with an [unchecked: viewrecursive] constraint. The implementation of org.jboss.portal.core.metadata.PortalObjectMetaData implies this is intended behavior:

  | if (securityConstraints == null)
  |       {
  |          if (this instanceof PortalMetaData || this instanceof PageMetaData)
  |          {
  |             // Default is view recursive
  |             securityConstraints = new SecurityConstraintsMetaData();
  |             RoleSecurityBinding binding = new RoleSecurityBinding(PortalObjectPermission.VIEW_RECURSIVE_ACTION, SecurityConstants.UNCHECKED_ROLE_NAME);
  |             securityConstraints.getConstraints().add(binding);
  |          }
  |       }
  | 
If this is really intended, then what are the semantics of 'viewrecursive'? It doesn't seem to have any effect on subpages at all, if those pages will always default to [unchecked viewrecursive]

Meanwhile, I'll just provide an explicit security constraint on each page, but I feel like I shouldn't have to.

p

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983758#3983758

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983758



More information about the jboss-user mailing list