[jboss-user] [IronJacamar] - Re: IronJacamar RHQ plugin

Lin Gao do-not-reply at jboss.com
Mon Jan 17 07:48:04 EST 2011

Lin Gao [http://community.jboss.org/people/gaol] created the discussion

"Re: IronJacamar RHQ plugin"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/581184#581184

Hi, Jepser:

   Thanks for the information.  :) 

Some questions:
> Yes, all deployments in the IronJacamar container should be registered with the ManagementRepository singleton. The IronJacamar management model is independant of the technology used, like JMX or RHQ.

1. The method of ManagementRepository.getInstance() is not declared as static, it should be, right?

2. Has the ManagementRepository been used already to register deployments when deploying some resources?

3. RHQ is Server/Agent architecture, which means it is possible that the agent plugin will work in another JVM than the jca container one.  Shall the IronJacamar RHQ plugin work only in the embedded jopr environment which does not require remote access or work in the RHQ HA environment also which will require remote access to the jca deployments?

Reply to this message by going to Community

Start a new discussion in IronJacamar at Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20110117/e0bef1f2/attachment.html 

More information about the jboss-user mailing list