[jboss-user] [IronJacamar] - Re: IronJacamar RHQ plugin

Jesper Pedersen do-not-reply at jboss.com
Mon Jan 17 14:44:07 EST 2011

Jesper Pedersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen] created the discussion

"Re: IronJacamar RHQ plugin"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/581354#581354

> 1. The method of ManagementRepository.getInstance() is not declared as static, it should be, right?

Ok, that class was wrong - see  https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-492 JBJCA-492 - the first couple of fixes have been committed.

There is one ManagementRepository per JCA container, so the class isn't static but must be injected into the code that needs it - or there must be a service that keeps a reference to it. Same idea as the MetadataRepository class.

> 2. Has the ManagementRepository been used already to register deployments when deploying some resources?

That part was missing for the standalone/embedded. It has been fixed as part of JBJCA-492.

> 3. RHQ is Server/Agent architecture, which means it is possible that the agent plugin will work in another JVM than the jca container one.  Shall the IronJacamar RHQ plugin work only in the embedded jopr environment which does not require remote access or work in the RHQ HA environment also which will require remote access to the jca deployments?

Lets start with EMBJOPR and go from there.

Reply to this message by going to Community

Start a new discussion in IronJacamar at Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20110117/502b04e5/attachment.html 

More information about the jboss-user mailing list