[jboss-user] [jBPM] - Re: Did JBPM 5+ drop jPDL support? Only BPMN?
Jan Uhlir
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Jan 26 17:14:25 EST 2012
Jan Uhlir [https://community.jboss.org/people/espinosa_cz] created the discussion
"Re: Did JBPM 5+ drop jPDL support? Only BPMN?"
To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/648959#648959
--------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Tihomir for prompt and insightful reply. Great community.
Though you did not pleased me much :(
> Tihomir Surdilovic wrote:
>
> >> *Was jPDL modelling language support droped?* <<
> Yes. In jBPM5 processes are represented via the BPMN2.0 standard. jPDL is/was a propriatary markup representation which did not follow any standards.
> *
>
I know, but still it was very handy language.
Glancing at BPMN 2 it seems like moving towards BPEL, towards a language of its own, except it does not rely heavily on web service. jPDL was more like a mapping process to a Java code. That's what I appreciated the most.
>
> >> *RedHat SOA <<*
> jBPM 3.x is still supported by Red Hat. Future versions of BRMS/SOA will include jBPM5 and thus also BPMN2.0.
> *
>
*
*
So the *latest* RedHat SOA (5.x) is based on jBPM version 3.x? Two major releases back?
Is it similar with other components too? I mean such version lag.
Anyway
Thank you very much
Espinosa
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[https://community.jboss.org/message/648959#648959]
Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community
[https://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2034]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20120126/4be44f5e/attachment.html
More information about the jboss-user
mailing list