[jbosscache-dev] Distributed locking in JBC
Brian Stansberry
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Mon Mar 12 13:36:25 EDT 2007
+100. I think this is a major missing feature. Agreed it can be
misused, but so can lots of other features.
Manik Surtani wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Is this something we want to implement in JBoss Cache in some shape or
> form, at some stage?
>
> I agree that here are scalability issues with such a feature, but is it
> not fair comment to say that there are use cases where this is critical,
> our competitors have this in some shape, and it may be a good idea to
> offer it?
>
> Specifically looking at a recent support case where each node in a
> cluster would, within the scope of a tx, read from the cache, increment
> the value read, and replace the value in the cache. So a write-mostly
> scenario here. And this would, when used with SYNC_REPL, inevitably
> deadlock after some while.
>
> Also, two of our most high-profile competitors - Tangosol and Terracotta
> - both have some form of distributed locking. Each one implemented
> differently, but it is there all the same.
>
> My question is, is this something we want to start thinking about?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Manik Surtani
>
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
> Email: manik at jboss.org
> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
> MSN: manik at surtani.org
> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
More information about the jbosscache-dev
mailing list