[jbosscache-dev] Distributed locking in JBC

Brian Stansberry brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Mon Mar 12 13:36:25 EDT 2007


+100. I think this is a major missing feature.  Agreed it can be 
misused, but so can lots of other features.

Manik Surtani wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> Is this something we want to implement in JBoss Cache in some shape or 
> form, at some stage?
> 
> I agree that here are scalability issues with such a feature, but is it 
> not fair comment to say that there are use cases where this is critical, 
> our competitors have this in some shape, and it may be a good idea to 
> offer it?
> 
> Specifically looking at a recent support case where each node in a 
> cluster would, within the scope of a tx, read from the cache, increment 
> the value read, and replace the value in the cache.  So a write-mostly 
> scenario here.  And this would, when used with SYNC_REPL, inevitably 
> deadlock after some while.
> 
> Also, two of our most high-profile competitors - Tangosol and Terracotta 
> - both have some form of distributed locking.  Each one implemented 
> differently, but it is there all the same.
> 
> My question is, is this something we want to start thinking about?
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
> 
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> 
> Email: manik at jboss.org
> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
> MSN: manik at surtani.org
> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev


-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com




More information about the jbosscache-dev mailing list