[jbosscache-dev] Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0

[Manik Surtani]

What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug  
fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?

On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of  
>> upcoming JBC releases.  :-)
>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>> Poblano and Naga?  :-)
>> -- 
>> Manik Surtani
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> manik at jboss.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
> -- 
> Brian Stansberry
> Lead, AS Clustering
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> brian.stansberry at redhat.com

--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik at jboss.org