[jbosscache-dev] Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0

[Brian Stansberry]

I was kidding. :)  Although the pepper shortage is becoming a serious issue.

I'll need a 2.1.1 due to timing but seems more whether you want a 2.2 is 
really whether you want to get some stuff out to the community before 
you start a long push on 3.0. I wouldn't make somehow getting 2.2 stuff 
into the AS a significant factor in your decision, as I think the odds 
aren't that high it will happen.

Manik Surtani wrote:
> What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug 
> fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
> 
> On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of 
>>> upcoming JBC releases.  :-)
>>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>>> Poblano and Naga?  :-)
>>> -- 
>>> Manik Surtani
>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>> manik at jboss.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>>> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>>
>> -- 
>> Brian Stansberry
>> Lead, AS Clustering
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> brian.stansberry at redhat.com
> 
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manik at jboss.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com