[jbosscache-dev] Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0

[Jason T. Greene]

I definitely need a 2.2 before a 3.0 (array interception), and I need it 
to be possible to include it in EAP5

Manik Surtani wrote:
> What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug 
> fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
> 
> On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of 
>>> upcoming JBC releases.  :-)
>>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>>> Poblano and Naga?  :-)
>>> -- 
>>> Manik Surtani
>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>> manik at jboss.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>>> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>>
>> -- 
>> Brian Stansberry
>> Lead, AS Clustering
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> brian.stansberry at redhat.com
> 
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manik at jboss.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev


-- 
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat