[jbossdeveloper] Do we need to tag the quickstarts?

Rafael Benevides benevides at redhat.com
Fri Aug 15 09:01:50 EDT 2014


Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup removing

- 6.2.x-develop
- 6.3.x-develop
- jdf-2.1.9.Final

branches (keeping the tags)

Btw,

There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were not 
updated since last year.


Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?

Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
> Rafael, that sounds great to me.
>
> Paul, does this work for you?
>
> On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>> I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x 
>> for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop
>>
>> 6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop
>> 6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1
>>
>> That's what I think about it.
>>
>>
>> Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>> Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and 
>>> create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do 
>>> this that I forget!
>>>
>>
>



More information about the jbossdeveloper mailing list