[jbossdeveloper] Do we need to tag the quickstarts?

[Paul Robinson]

Comments in line for this email and your first one.

On 15 Aug 2014, at 14:01, Rafael Benevides <benevides at redhat.com> wrote:

> Ref to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup removing
> 
> - 6.2.x-develop
> - 6.3.x-develop

IMO: Correct, providing there are no micro releases of EAP 6.2 and EAP 6.3 planned.

> - jdf-2.1.9.Final
> 
> branches (keeping the tags)
> 
> Btw,
> 
> There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that were not 
> updated since last year.
> 
> 
> Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?
> 
> Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>> Rafael, that sounds great to me.
>> 
>> Paul, does this work for you?
>> 
>> On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>> I think we should tag the 6.3 quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x 
>>> for EAP 6.3.1 and rename the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop
>>> 
>>> 6.3.x-develop -> rename to 6.4.x-develop
>>> 6.3.x -> keep it to EAP 6.3.1

This looks right to me too. See: https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-928619

>>> 
>>> That's what I think about it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>>> Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we need to tag the quickstarts and 
>>>> create new branches for EAP 6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do 
>>>> this that I forget!
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbossdeveloper mailing list
> jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper


Paul.

-- 
Paul Robinson
JBoss Developer Team Lead (www.jboss.org)

JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors:Michael Cunningham (US), Charles Peters (US), Matt Parson (US), Paul Hickey (Ireland)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbossdeveloper/attachments/20140815/b2c4267d/attachment.html