[jbossdeveloper] <repository /> on quickstarts pom.xml
Vineet Reynolds Pereira
vpereira at redhat.com
Fri Oct 31 09:34:10 EDT 2014
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen at redhat.com>
> To: "Rafael Benevides" <benevides at redhat.com>
> Cc: jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org, "Alexandre Porcelli" <alexandre.porcelli at gmail.com>, "Tomas Repel"
> <trepel at redhat.com>, "Nikoleta Ziakova" <nziakova at redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 6:53:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [jbossdeveloper] <repository /> on quickstarts pom.xml
>
> On 31 Oct 2014, at 13:58, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>
> > I know which dependencies were causing the build to fail and where to
> > find them, but it seems that Alexandre wanted to show users how to run
> > a
> > project as easy as clone, build and run.
> >
> > If I'm not wrong, this discussion started with similar issues in this
> > Arun Gupta Twitter thread:
> > https://twitter.com/arungupta/status/502854638832730112
>
> so this is a different question.
>
> Question is if we should add the techpreview/all to
> quickstarts/examples.
>
> Not about earlyaccess.
>
> And afaik we already did this for quickstarts with a clear warning,
> right ?
AFAIK, they're not in the POM of the quickstarts. A settings.xml is supplied instead:
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-wfk-quickstarts/blob/2.6.0.Final/settings.xml
But, that would deflect the original question on whether we should add it to POM.
Honestly, I dont mind adding it, with the warning that for a real-world project, the repo should instead be in the settings.xml.
>
> Thus if ticketmonster does not have that in there I would say it would
> make sense to add it
> with similar warning/text as the quickstarts.
>
> /max
>
> >
> > As I also told Alexandre that we were having this discussion, I
> > invited
> > him to give his feedback on this Thread so he can provide more
> > details.
> >
> > Alexandre,
> >
> > Do you mind to share your restrictions and perceptions about the build
> > process ?
> >
> > On 10/31/14 06:47, Marek Novotny wrote:
> >>>> What restrictions does he have ?
> >>>>
> >>>> And I guess the issue here is ticketmonster master needs the
> >>>> earlyaccess bits ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think ticketmonster master could add the earlyaccess to its pom
> >>>> but
> >>>> then just make sure once it is releaesed it gets removed which
> >>>> should
> >>>> be fine since then it should be using any earlyaccess bundles,
> >>>> right ?
> >> Not really, ticket-monster master branch doesn't exist. The closest
> >> to
> >> master is 2.6.0.Final -
> >> https://github.com/jboss-developer/ticket-monster/tree/2.6.0.Final -
> >> which is the tight to WFK 2.6.0.GA and all GAVs should be resolvable
> >> fromhttp://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/
> >>
> >> I think that Rafael knows that 2.7.x-develop is unstable and includes
> >> internal product GAVs which are not in all or earlyaccess.
> >>
> >> So if Alexandre uses 2.6.0.Final branch/tag he should get it to work
> >> just with online redhat repository
> >> http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/. If not please
> >> advice him to send errors to Vineet or me.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jbossdeveloper mailing list
> > jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
>
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
> _______________________________________________
> jbossdeveloper mailing list
> jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
>
More information about the jbossdeveloper
mailing list