> Le 31 oct. 2014 à 09:34, Vineet Reynolds Pereira <vpereira at redhat.com> a écrit :
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen at redhat.com <mailto:max.andersen at redhat.com>>
>> To: "Rafael Benevides" <benevides at redhat.com <mailto:benevides at redhat.com>>
>> Cc: jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org>, "Alexandre Porcelli" <alexandre.porcelli at gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.porcelli at gmail.com>>, "Tomas Repel"
>> <trepel at redhat.com <mailto:trepel at redhat.com>>, "Nikoleta Ziakova" <nziakova at redhat.com <mailto:nziakova at redhat.com>>
>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 6:53:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: [jbossdeveloper] <repository /> on quickstarts pom.xml
>>
>> On 31 Oct 2014, at 13:58, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>
>>> I know which dependencies were causing the build to fail and where to
>>> find them, but it seems that Alexandre wanted to show users how to run
>>> a
>>> project as easy as clone, build and run.
>>>
>>> If I'm not wrong, this discussion started with similar issues in this
>>> Arun Gupta Twitter thread:
>>> https://twitter.com/arungupta/status/502854638832730112
>>
>> so this is a different question.
>>
>> Question is if we should add the techpreview/all to
>> quickstarts/examples.
>>
>> Not about earlyaccess.
>>
>> And afaik we already did this for quickstarts with a clear warning,
>> right ?
>
> AFAIK, they're not in the POM of the quickstarts. A settings.xml is supplied instead:
> https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-wfk-quickstarts/blob/2.6.0.Final/settings.xml <https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-wfk-quickstarts/blob/2.6.0.Final/settings.xml>
>
> But, that would deflect the original question on whether we should add it to POM.
> Honestly, I dont mind adding it, with the warning that for a real-world project, the repo should instead be in the settings.xml.
+1
In JBT/JBDS, if you ctrl+space in the <repositories> section of a pom.xml, you’ll see templates to add JBoss/Red Hat repo definitions. This is what we add then :
<!-- You should seriously consider using a repository manager or declare repositories in your settings.xml.
See http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/02/why-putting-repositories-in-your-poms-is-a-bad-idea/ -->
<repository>
<!-- The JBoss Public repository is a composite repository of several major repositories.
See http://community.jboss.org/wiki/MavenGettingStarted-Users -->
<id>jboss-public-repository</id>
<url>http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public</url>
<releases>
<enabled>true</enabled>
</releases>
<!-- You can disable snapshot resolution to speed up your builds -->
<snapshots>
<enabled>true</enabled>
</snapshots>
</repository>
>
>>
>> Thus if ticketmonster does not have that in there I would say it would
>> make sense to add it
>> with similar warning/text as the quickstarts.
>>
>> /max
>>
>>>
>>> As I also told Alexandre that we were having this discussion, I
>>> invited
>>> him to give his feedback on this Thread so he can provide more
>>> details.
>>>
>>> Alexandre,
>>>
>>> Do you mind to share your restrictions and perceptions about the build
>>> process ?
>>>
>>> On 10/31/14 06:47, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>>> What restrictions does he have ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And I guess the issue here is ticketmonster master needs the
>>>>>> earlyaccess bits ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think ticketmonster master could add the earlyaccess to its pom
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> then just make sure once it is releaesed it gets removed which
>>>>>> should
>>>>>> be fine since then it should be using any earlyaccess bundles,
>>>>>> right ?
>>>> Not really, ticket-monster master branch doesn't exist. The closest
>>>> to
>>>> master is 2.6.0.Final -
>>>> https://github.com/jboss-developer/ticket-monster/tree/2.6.0.Final -
>>>> which is the tight to WFK 2.6.0.GA and all GAVs should be resolvable
>>>> fromhttp://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/
>>>>
>>>> I think that Rafael knows that 2.7.x-develop is unstable and includes
>>>> internal product GAVs which are not in all or earlyaccess.
>>>>
>>>> So if Alexandre uses 2.6.0.Final branch/tag he should get it to work
>>>> just with online redhat repository
>>>> http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/. If not please
>>>> advice him to send errors to Vineet or me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbossdeveloper mailing list
>>> jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
>>
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbossdeveloper mailing list
>> jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jbossdeveloper mailing list
> jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbossdeveloper/attachments/20141031/751f844c/attachment.html