[jbosstools-dev] Git - do it fully or not ?
Libor Zoubek
lzoubek at redhat.com
Mon Mar 7 08:11:04 EST 2011
+1 for git.
Work with svn is very slow and disk-consuming and I have still issues 'svn
up', it still needs cleanup, or refuses to update. I started to hate svn,
please unschackle me :-)
Libor
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:54:34 +0100, Max Rydahl Andersen
<max.andersen at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We got our svn mirror now but after working with it a bit its basically
> just as slow as normal svn (if you can get it to work).
>
> ...thus i'm wondering if anyone can come up with good reasons to *not*
> just move all new development over to git and simply kill off
> the SVN completely for our jbosstools trunk development ?
>
> 3.2.x would stay in SVN.
>
> Comments/Suggestions/Screams/Objections ?
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
More information about the jbosstools-dev
mailing list