[jbosstools-dev] Git - do it fully or not ?

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

> +1 for git.
> 
> Work with svn is very slow and disk-consuming and I have still issues 'svn  
> up', it still needs cleanup, or refuses to update. I started to hate svn,  
> please unschackle me :-)

Btw. Nick and I had a chat the other day about what actually prevent us from moving and
if it was just a question about git vs svn then we could easily move (assuming windows users
are fine with using bash/cygwin)

The challenge is that hudson+git is not as flexible as it currently is with svn and we don't yet
have a good use of having our builds pick up latest/matching dependencies from a repository -
thus not trivial to move away from git fully :(

Will require a lot of effort.

/max


> 
> Libor
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:54:34 +0100, Max Rydahl Andersen  
> <max.andersen at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hey,
>> 
>> We got our svn mirror now but after working with it a bit its basically  
>> just as slow as normal svn (if you can get it to work).
>> 
>> ...thus i'm wondering if anyone can come up with good reasons to *not*  
>> just move all new development over to git and simply kill off
>> the SVN completely for our jbosstools trunk development ?
>> 
>> 3.2.x would stay in SVN.
>> 
>> Comments/Suggestions/Screams/Objections ?
>> 
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen