[jbosstools-dev] CDI/Seam security xml weirdness

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

I'm not convinced that's an error.

In that case the docs and examples would be wrong. Do you get errors
using the nonimpl class at runtime ?

Remember the whole point is that you can configure beans abstractly
and then at runtime they are instantiated with the concrete instances.

/max (sent from my phone)


On 07/10/2011, at 18.54, Viacheslav Kabanovich <scabanovich at exadel.com> wrote:

> Hi, Max
>
> org.jboss.seam.security.Identity is an interface and cannot be configured as a managed bean in config xml.
> org.jboss.seam.security.IdentityImpl is ok to be configured.
>
> I added validation that marks configuring abstract types as errors in JBIDE-9834 last week.
>
> Slava
>
> On 10/07/2011 04:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Hi Slava/Alexey,
>>
>> Have you seen this thread: http://seamframework.org/Community/SecurityCannotResolveMemberInNodeSecurityauthenticatorClass
>> referenced from http://community.jboss.org/message/630545#630545
>>
>> It sounds very wrong that the Impl name is the correct one.
>>
>> Is the tool not validating wrong here ?
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>