[jbosstools-dev] CDI/Seam security xml weirdness

[Alexey Kazakov]

On 10/07/2011 11:25 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> I'm not convinced that's an error.
>
> In that case the docs and examples would be wrong. Do you get errors
> using the nonimpl class at runtime ?
The examples use <ss:IdentityImpl> name. Not Identity.
It seems to be an issue of the docs and maybe Seam Security which forces 
users to use <ss:IdentityImpl> to have it working.

>
> Remember the whole point is that you can configure beans abstractly
> and then at runtime they are instantiated with the concrete instances.
>
> /max (sent from my phone)
>
>
> On 07/10/2011, at 18.54, Viacheslav Kabanovich<scabanovich at exadel.com>  wrote:
>
>> Hi, Max
>>
>> org.jboss.seam.security.Identity is an interface and cannot be configured as a managed bean in config xml.
>> org.jboss.seam.security.IdentityImpl is ok to be configured.
>>
>> I added validation that marks configuring abstract types as errors in JBIDE-9834 last week.
>>
>> Slava
>>
>> On 10/07/2011 04:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> Hi Slava/Alexey,
>>>
>>> Have you seen this thread: http://seamframework.org/Community/SecurityCannotResolveMemberInNodeSecurityauthenticatorClass
>>> referenced from http://community.jboss.org/message/630545#630545
>>>
>>> It sounds very wrong that the Impl name is the correct one.
>>>
>>> Is the tool not validating wrong here ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev