[jbosstools-dev] Eclipse Juno testing

Max Rydahl Andersen max.andersen at redhat.com
Mon Apr 16 09:48:47 EDT 2012 

what is the version bump change they did from indigo to juno ?

/max

On Apr 16, 2012, at 15:35 , Dmitry Geraskov wrote:

> There are 2 issues listed on the page which changes the API.
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277017
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319736
> 
> But not all of the changes are described there. Here are the changes which impact us:
> 
> Classes which were removed?
> org.eclipse.jpt.common.utility.model.value.WritablePropertyValueModel;
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.context.java.JavaStructureNodes;
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.ui.navigator.JpaNavigatorProvider;
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.context.Table.Owner;
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AnnotationContainer;
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.JavaResourcePersistentAttribute
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.ui.structure.JpaStructureProvider
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.NamedQueriesAnnotation
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.NamedNativeQueriesAnnotation
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AttributeOverridesAnnotation
> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AssociationOverridesAnnotation
> 
> 
> Disappeared/moved/renamed
> OrmJoinColumn.Owner
> JptJpaCorePlugin.rebuildJpaProject(getProject());
> JavaPersistentAttribute.getResourcePersistentAttribute()
> PersistenceUnit.mappingFileRefsContaining(...)
> Persistence.persistenceUnits()
> JavaPersistentType.attributes()
> JpaJpqlQueryHelper made abstract
> JavaGeneratorContainer.Owner
> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.addAnnotation(int, string, string)
> PersistentType.allAttributes()
> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.annotations(String, String)
> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.attributes()
>  and others
> 
> Many public package name changes
> 
> Note: some of them are listed there, but some not. In the list only the changes in public packages.
> 
> Dmitry
> 
> 16.04.2012 15:40, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> i.e. http://wiki.eclipse.org/New_Help_for_Old_Friends_VII
>>  mentions nothing of this so if this is anywhere near public API we should raise this ASAP!
>> 
>> /max
>> 
>> On Apr 16, 2012, at 14:37 , Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> 16.04.2012 15:21, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> What are the plans to make commits for Eclipse Juno possible? Are we going to have a branch for it or will migrate trunk soon?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> We are looking to try and be compatible.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I had a lot of changes as usual in JPT plugins.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Again !? Aren't we able to avoid these ?
>>>>> 
>>>> Yes, they consolidated of the java resource model  for JAXB and JPA.
>>>> 
>>> So I assume that means a No ?
>>> 
>>> And they completely broke all public API or is this just related to their internal API ?
>>> 
>>> /max
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Please for now, simply open jiras with problems found and create subtasks/links to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11549
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Max
>>>>> 
>>>>> p.s. I removed all the non-relevant mailing lists and just left jbosstools-dev for these specifics.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dmitry
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 14.04.2012 18:51, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:32:29) ldimaggi_: nboldt, bfitzpat stupid question - Juno
>>>>>>> is 4.2 - what's 3.8?
>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:32:43) bfitzpat: also Juno
>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:33:02) bfitzpat: 3.8 and 4.2 are both Juno, but 4.2 is
>>>>>>> the main version and 3.8 is the 3.x stream version
>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:34:10) bfitzpat: 3.x is on its way out eventually
>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:34:44) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, got it - so - we need to
>>>>>>> test.............both - and 3.7 to I think   ;-)
>>>>>>> 13:35
>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:35:16) bfitzpat: yeah, well... we don't really have a 4.2
>>>>>>> ready build yet so far as I know
>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:35:26) bfitzpat: though Nick is pushing to test some
>>>>>>> early stuff
>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:36:23) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, that's why I asked   ;-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Since 4.2 is already at M6 [1], the window of opportunity to discover
>>>>>>> what (if anything) in JBDS won't run on it is nearly closed. After M7
>>>>>>> (Star Wars Day*) only hold-the-presses, stop-ship issues will be
>>>>>>> CONSIDERED, much less fixed.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sure, we can report issues against upstream later on and they'll get
>>>>>>> fixed (maybe) in SR1 (September 2012) or SR2 (February 2013) but
>>>>>>> ideally, JBDS 5 would run OOTB on Eclipse 4.2/3.8 as well as 3.7,
>>>>>>> without our needing to patch stuff in Eclipse or WTP (like we have had
>>>>>>> to do in past years, particularly re: SWT or equinox). Ideally, we'd be
>>>>>>> able to have the same JBDS 5 bits working on BOTH Eclipse 3.7.2 and 4.2/3.8.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So, to that end, we need to start testing builds [2] and installs of
>>>>>>> JBDS 5 on the new Juno platform as well as the existing Indigo one.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Juno/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Milestones_and_Release_Candidates
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469?focusedCommentId=12684016#comment-12684016
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As to the question of 3.8 vs. 4.2, 3.x is the old stream which is being
>>>>>>> (eventually) phased out. 4.2 includes a compatibility layer so that in
>>>>>>> theory anything 3.x-dependent can run on 4.2 as well. The TP I built
>>>>>>> includes the 4.2 bits (which in turn include much of the 3.8 site too).
>>>>>>> My fond hope is that I won't need to include any additional 3.8-level
>>>>>>> plugins beyond what's already in the Juno or Eclipse 4.2 sites.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> More info&   links: 
>>>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>> 
>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> 
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list