[jbosstools-dev] Eclipse Juno testing

Mon Apr 16 10:23:13 EDT 2012

common features version changed from 1.0.0 to 1.2.0
jpt.jpa features version changed from 3.0.0 to 3.2.0

16.04.2012 16:48, Max Rydahl Andersen написал:
> what is the version bump change they did from indigo to juno ?
>
> /max
>
> On Apr 16, 2012, at 15:35 , Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
>
>> There are 2 issues listed on the page which changes the API.
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277017
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319736
>>
>> But not all of the changes are described there. Here are the changes which impact us:
>>
>> Classes which were removed?
>> org.eclipse.jpt.common.utility.model.value.WritablePropertyValueModel;
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.context.java.JavaStructureNodes;
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.ui.navigator.JpaNavigatorProvider;
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.context.Table.Owner;
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AnnotationContainer;
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.JavaResourcePersistentAttribute
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.ui.structure.JpaStructureProvider
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.NamedQueriesAnnotation
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.NamedNativeQueriesAnnotation
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AttributeOverridesAnnotation
>> org.eclipse.jpt.jpa.core.resource.java.AssociationOverridesAnnotation
>>
>>
>> Disappeared/moved/renamed
>> OrmJoinColumn.Owner
>> JptJpaCorePlugin.rebuildJpaProject(getProject());
>> JavaPersistentAttribute.getResourcePersistentAttribute()
>> PersistenceUnit.mappingFileRefsContaining(...)
>> Persistence.persistenceUnits()
>> JavaPersistentType.attributes()
>> JpaJpqlQueryHelper made abstract
>> JavaGeneratorContainer.Owner
>> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.addAnnotation(int, string, string)
>> PersistentType.allAttributes()
>> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.annotations(String, String)
>> JavaResourceAnnotatedElement.attributes()
>>   and others
>>
>> Many public package name changes
>>
>> Note: some of them are listed there, but some not. In the list only the changes in public packages.
>>
>> Dmitry
>>
>> 16.04.2012 15:40, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> i.e. http://wiki.eclipse.org/New_Help_for_Old_Friends_VII
>>>   mentions nothing of this so if this is anywhere near public API we should raise this ASAP!
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> On Apr 16, 2012, at 14:37 , Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> 16.04.2012 15:21, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What are the plans to make commits for Eclipse Juno possible? Are we going to have a branch for it or will migrate trunk soon?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are looking to try and be compatible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had a lot of changes as usual in JPT plugins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again !? Aren't we able to avoid these ?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, they consolidated of the java resource model  for JAXB and JPA.
>>>>>
>>>> So I assume that means a No ?
>>>>
>>>> And they completely broke all public API or is this just related to their internal API ?
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>>> Please for now, simply open jiras with problems found and create subtasks/links to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11549
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>
>>>>>> p.s. I removed all the non-relevant mailing lists and just left jbosstools-dev for these specifics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dmitry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 14.04.2012 18:51, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:32:29) ldimaggi_: nboldt, bfitzpat stupid question - Juno
>>>>>>>> is 4.2 - what's 3.8?
>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:32:43) bfitzpat: also Juno
>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:33:02) bfitzpat: 3.8 and 4.2 are both Juno, but 4.2 is
>>>>>>>> the main version and 3.8 is the 3.x stream version
>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:34:10) bfitzpat: 3.x is on its way out eventually
>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:34:44) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, got it - so - we need to
>>>>>>>> test.............both - and 3.7 to I think   ;-)
>>>>>>>> 13:35
>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:35:16) bfitzpat: yeah, well... we don't really have a 4.2
>>>>>>>> ready build yet so far as I know
>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:35:26) bfitzpat: though Nick is pushing to test some
>>>>>>>> early stuff
>>>>>>>> (2012-04-13 13:36:23) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, that's why I asked   ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since 4.2 is already at M6 [1], the window of opportunity to discover
>>>>>>>> what (if anything) in JBDS won't run on it is nearly closed. After M7
>>>>>>>> (Star Wars Day*) only hold-the-presses, stop-ship issues will be
>>>>>>>> CONSIDERED, much less fixed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, we can report issues against upstream later on and they'll get
>>>>>>>> fixed (maybe) in SR1 (September 2012) or SR2 (February 2013) but
>>>>>>>> ideally, JBDS 5 would run OOTB on Eclipse 4.2/3.8 as well as 3.7,
>>>>>>>> without our needing to patch stuff in Eclipse or WTP (like we have had
>>>>>>>> to do in past years, particularly re: SWT or equinox). Ideally, we'd be
>>>>>>>> able to have the same JBDS 5 bits working on BOTH Eclipse 3.7.2 and 4.2/3.8.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, to that end, we need to start testing builds [2] and installs of
>>>>>>>> JBDS 5 on the new Juno platform as well as the existing Indigo one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Juno/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Milestones_and_Release_Candidates
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469?focusedCommentId=12684016#comment-12684016
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As to the question of 3.8 vs. 4.2, 3.x is the old stream which is being
>>>>>>>> (eventually) phased out. 4.2 includes a compatibility layer so that in
>>>>>>>> theory anything 3.x-dependent can run on 4.2 as well. The TP I built
>>>>>>>> includes the 4.2 bits (which in turn include much of the 3.8 site too).
>>>>>>>> My fond hope is that I won't need to include any additional 3.8-level
>>>>>>>> plugins beyond what's already in the Juno or Eclipse 4.2 sites.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More info&    links:
>>>>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>
>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev