[jbosstools-dev] Who still uses Emma coverage reports?

[Mickael Istria]

Hi all.

Since we've made significant progress over the last months on using 
Jacoco, and that this should now be easier to consume, given 
improvements developed as part of 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-12742 , I'm wondering if we still 
require Emma. Are Emma reports still used by anyone of you all? If yes, 
can you please describe why you prefer Emma reports to Jacoco ones (it's 
a real question, no intimidation here ;) ?
Here is how you can access Jacoco reports: 
https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/DevStudio/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-4.0_trunk.component--central/ 
. Any suggestion to make it more widely used is welcome.

Emma is technically obsolete compared to Jacoco, and it costs 100 lines 
of addition in parent pom (more than 10% of the pom) + a folder in 
currenly messy "build" folder. If no-one uses it, I'd like to remove 
that stuff to make the parent pom cleaner/simpler.

Any feedback is highly welcome.
-- 
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets 
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>

<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20121003/2f849b24/attachment.html