[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-5005) *Actually* make an export function which draws from IModule objects as backing engine

[Rob Stryker (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12489068#action_12489068 ] 

Rob Stryker commented on JBIDE-5005:
------------------------------------

Issues:

- What category should this export action live in? Currently I put it in the J2EE category. 
- What image should it have? Currently I have an empty jar icon
- What should its name be? Currently I have it as "Module Archive"


> *Actually* make an export function which draws from IModule objects as backing engine
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-5005
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5005
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: JBossAS
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0.M3
>            Reporter: Rob Stryker
>            Assignee: Rob Stryker
>             Fix For: 3.1.0.M4
>
>
> Previously this action was done and submitted to WTP as a patch but was not accepted. It was suggested for the ESB export, but the current ESB export is actually a clonse of the current WTP export functionality and is not the very different type we had been planning to get. 
> Take the WTP patch and put it into our tree and then remove ESB export (or have ESB export simply extend if cosmetically we want that to be listed). 
> Max: Should the ESB export function be removed? Or should it simply be an empty shell / subclass around the new module-style export function I've made? 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira