[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-5005) *Actually* make an export function which draws from IModule objects as backing engine
Rob Stryker (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Oct 8 18:25:18 EDT 2009
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12489079#action_12489079 ]
Rob Stryker commented on JBIDE-5005:
------------------------------------
Committed hte absolute bulk of the changes necessary. Eclipse bug for reference: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265798
> *Actually* make an export function which draws from IModule objects as backing engine
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-5005
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5005
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: JBossAS
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0.M3
> Reporter: Rob Stryker
> Assignee: Rob Stryker
> Fix For: 3.1.0.M4
>
>
> Previously this action was done and submitted to WTP as a patch but was not accepted. It was suggested for the ESB export, but the current ESB export is actually a clonse of the current WTP export functionality and is not the very different type we had been planning to get.
> Take the WTP patch and put it into our tree and then remove ESB export (or have ESB export simply extend if cosmetically we want that to be listed).
> Max: Should the ESB export function be removed? Or should it simply be an empty shell / subclass around the new module-style export function I've made?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jbosstools-issues
mailing list