[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-10212) JBoss Perspective: File-New Options

Serge Emmanuel Pagop (Commented) (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Nov 24 02:40:40 EST 2011


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645304#comment-12645304 ] 

Serge Emmanuel Pagop commented on JBIDE-10212:
----------------------------------------------

Burr and Jim,

I found this list (Java EE 6 WAR, Java EE 6 EAR, HTML5 Project, RichFaces Project, SpringMVC, Dynamic Web Project) ok. Jim concerning Java EE6 EAR, yes is old school, but still relevant in the Java EE 6 scene when we are talking about  higher modularization requirement and it is also one of the required assembling support of Java EE 6 modules.
It will be great to have:
- Java EE 6 Application Client Project "packaging type JAR":  for application client, that can be used to access session beans
- Java EE 6 Enterprise Application "packaging type JAR":  create EJB modules (stateless session beans or stateful session beans or singleton session bean)

May be we can also think about "Java EE6 JAX-WS Project / Java EE6 JAX-RS Project".

Cheers,
Serge.

From: "Jim Tyrrell" <jtyrrell at redhat.com>
To: "Burr Sutter" <bsutter at redhat.com>
Cc: "Serge Pagop" <spagop at redhat.com>, "Blaine Mincey" <bmincey at redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 8:56:54 PM
Subject: Re: Please provide comment on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10212

Burr,

So that list....
Java EE 6 WAR
Java EE 6 EAR
HTML5 Project
RichFaces Project
SpringMVC
Dynamic Web Project

Why war and ear, isn't that confusing....if this is a top level list...then I think it should not include EAR

Should "Mobile Project" be one of these choices....

Ray is talking about the "JBoss Way" on another list, should that be in this list... 

Other then those thoughts, I think this is a good list...other then CDI probably needs to be in this...as IBM/Oracle and even us are making noise about that spec...
in that vein in War and Ear too "old school"

Jim Tyrrell
Principal JBoss Solutions Architect

Did you see RHT on Cramer?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/39401056






On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:

We are starting to tweak JBoss Central & JBoss Perspective.  A key thing is that the New project templates in Central and the Perspective (File New menu) should match.

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10212

Do you have any proposals on the labels?  We are basically talking about the Maven archetypes.


                
> JBoss Perspective: File-New Options
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBIDE-10212
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10212
>             Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: common/jst/core
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M4
>            Reporter: Burr Sutter
>            Assignee: Denis Golovin
>             Fix For: 3.3.0.M5
>
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2011-11-22 at 10.47.56 AM.png
>
>
> File-New options should match the Create Projects section of JBoss Central.
> Java EE 6 WAR
> Java EE 6 EAR
> HTML5 Project
> RichFaces Project
> SpringMVC
> Dynamic Web Project
> The ordering should match JBoss Central as well.
> Note: let's discuss these final labels in the comments section.
>  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the jbosstools-issues mailing list