[jbossws-dev] WS-RM, depends on WS-Policy, WS-PolicyAttachment

[Mark Little]

I'd suggest doing WS-Policy first because several other  
specifications need it.

Mark.


On 27 Feb 2007, at 17:34, Thomas Diesler wrote:

> I am wondering whether to integrate WS-Policy, WS-PolicyAttachments
> first before we move on to WS-RM. From an implemenation perspective
> WS-RM depends on WS-PO, WS-POA
>
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 13:27 +0000, Mark Little wrote:
>> Are you asking whether WS-Policy is a better starting point than  
>> WS-RM?
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>> On 27 Feb 2007, at 13:17, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> you've probably already noticed that WS-RM has dependency on WS-
>>> Policy,
>>> WS-PolicyAttachment for configuration purposes. Not sure if it makes
>>> sense to start with those pieces. OTOH it may make sence to provide
>>> configuration aspects in an alternative manner to get started.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> -thomas
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Thomas Diesler
>>> Web Service Lead
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbossws-dev mailing list
>>> jbossws-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev
>>
> -- 
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thomas Diesler
> Web Service Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>